Scroll to top

Cashing In, Out on Slot Machine Route


July 4, 2018December 12, 2019No comments

Downtown Las Vegas, 1950s

1951-1954

In October 1951, Southern California resident, Wayne H. Teipel, responded to a “For Sale” ad in the Los Angeles Examiner for a slot machine, pinball game and phonograph route business in Las Vegas, Nevada. The income touted was $1,000 a week (about $9,600 today) and the price, $28,500 ($276,000).

Ray Wherrit of San Luis Obispo, on California’s Central Coast, was selling the enterprise, Southern Nevada Vending Company, six months after he’d gotten a gambling license to run it.

Numbers Check
Teipel learned from the broker the business netted about $300 ($2,900) a week. A memo signed by Wherrit and shown to the prospective buyer noted weekly gross income between $850 and $1,250 ($8,200 and $12,000).

This difference between gross and net indicated weekly expenses were $550 to $950 ($5,300 to $9,100), much of that being city, county and federal taxes paid on the machines.

Teipel put down a $1,500 ($14,500) refundable deposit, buying himself time to investigate the business.

He reviewed its various financial documents, including bank deposits, which, for July through September, showed weekly income of less than $1,000 ($9,600). He pored over the ledgers, which detailed the money collected from every customer on the route along with the taxes due and paid since day one. Teipel and the broker visited several of the client locations.

Lock, Stock and Barrel
Teipel purchased the route on October 23, including the equipment, customers and goodwill, and wrote a check for $13,682 ($132,000). He was to pay off the $10,383 ($100,000) balance in monthly installments of $433 ($4,200).

The two parties signed the appropriate sale documents, including a noncompete agreement indicating Wherrit wouldn’t participate in a similar business within a 50-mile radius of Las Vegas for five years.

Wherrit provided a week’s worth of hands-on assistance in transitioning the business to Teipel. During that time, buyer and seller drove the route together and compiled an inventory and a list of the required taxes for each location. 

Change of Mind
After another week, the United States Congress doubled the yearly federal tax on individual slot and pinball machines, to $250 from $150 (to $2,400 from $1,400). Teipel telephoned and complained to the broker about the tax increase and the less-than-expected amount of money the route was generating. 

On November 5, Teipel abandoned the business and returned to Los Angeles. Ten days later, his attorney served Wherrit with a notice of rescission, which undoes or terminates a contract on the basis of fraud. A contract rescission requires that all parties be restored to their pre-deal states, which includes returning any benefits received while the contract was in force.

End of the Road
The case went to trial. Teipel, the plaintiff, claimed that when Wherrit had run Southern Nevada Vending, he’d recorded the dollar amounts collected incorrectly and had misrepresented the business and income to him intentionally.

As for the machines and the route, Teipel reported he didn’t know what had come of them and couldn’t reproduce any of the equipment.

The court found that Teipel had acquired the business “only after a full and complete investigation and that there had been no fraud,” according to a case summary. Therefore, Wherrit wasn’t mandated to sign and honor the rescission contract or return to Teipel the sale proceeds.

Teipel appealed, without success. In 1954, the Court of Appeals of California heard the case and concurred with the original ruling.

Sources

Related posts

Post a Comment